Legal Opinion

Sears v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1972No. 71-72PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

0’Neill, C. J.

This appeal again brings before this court the question of whether a municipality, which owns a municipal hospital, may assert the defense of governmental immunity in a suit for the negligent acts of the hospital’s employees occuring within the scope of their employment or agency.

The existing rule, as expressed in the syllabus of Hyde v. Lakewood, supra (2 Ohio St. 2d 155), is that:

“1. Unless there is a statute removing immunity, a governmental unit or agency may escape liability for the commission of a tort upon a showing that a governmental function was being performed at the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hyde v. City of LakewoodOhio Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Goodson v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Haverlack v. Portage Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Enghauser Manufacturing Co. v. Eriksson Engineering Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Hicks v. De La CruzOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Greenhalgh v. Payson CityUtah Supreme Court · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API