Legal Opinion

Hicks v. De La Cruz

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1977No. 76-1317PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants contend that, on a motion for summary judgment, it was improper for the trial court to rule that the University of Cincinnati, the city of Cincinnati and the university board of trustees, all doing business as Cincinnati General Hospital, had state governmental immunity in the ownership and/or operation of the hospital, and so were immune from liabilities and actions arising from negligence at the hospital. Appellants, rely heavily upon Sears v. Cincinnati (1972), 31 Ohio St. 2d 157, 285 N. E. 2d 732.

The Court of Common Pleas in the instant cause deter*73mined npon the evidence before…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. General Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Sears v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. McHone v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1975

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Goodson v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Walden v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Sill v. Sweeney (In Re Sweeney)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  4. Trautwein v. SorgenfreiOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1996

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API