Legal Opinion
Greenhalgh v. Payson City
Utah Supreme Court
Decided January 2, 1975No. 13695PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Justice:
Plaintiffs Greenhalgh, in their own right, and as parents of infant son Patrick, sued for various damages (the detail of which is not material in view of our disposition of this appeal) alleged to have resulted from negligence of the defendants Payson City Hospital and Dr. Robert Hogan in the improper typing of the Rh negative blood of plaintiff Coralee Greenhalgh and her newborn baby, Patrick Green-halgh. After a hearing, and pursuant to defendants’ motions to dismiss, the court ruled that these causes of action, which were not filed until nearly four years (46 months)…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Henderson v. Twin Falls CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
- Bingham v. BD. OF ED. OF OGDEN CITYUtah Supreme Court · 1950
- Christiansen v. ReesUtah Supreme Court · 1968
- Gallegos Ex Rel. Gallegos v. Midvale CityUtah Supreme Court · 1972
- Olivas v. WeinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Condemarin v. University HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Standiford v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
- DeBry v. NobleUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- MacKu by and Through MacKu v. Drackett Prod. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- State of Minn. Ex Rel. Hove v. DoeseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.