Legal Opinion

Hyde v. City of Lakewood

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1965No. Nos. 38459 and 38955PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmbrmaN, J.

This court has not yet abandoned the principle that, where a municipal corporation is engaged in the exercise of a governmental function and a tort is committed by it while it is so engaged, there is no liability. In line with a number of other jurisdictions, Ohio still adheres to the general rule that, unless there is a statute removing immunity, a governmental unit or agency may escape liability for the commission of a tort upon a showing that a governmental function was being performed at the time the tort occurred. Broughton v. City of Cleveland, 167 Ohio St. 29, 146 N. E. 2d 301, and the…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sayre v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1967
  2. Scott v. City of Columbus Department of Public UtilitiesOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Haas v. HayslipOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Thacker v. Board of TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Sears v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API