Hyde v. City of Lakewood
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZimmbrmaN, J.
This court has not yet abandoned the principle that, where a municipal corporation is engaged in the exercise of a governmental function and a tort is committed by it while it is so engaged, there is no liability. In line with a number of other jurisdictions, Ohio still adheres to the general rule that, unless there is a statute removing immunity, a governmental unit or agency may escape liability for the commission of a tort upon a showing that a governmental function was being performed at the time the tort occurred. Broughton v. City of Cleveland, 167 Ohio St. 29, 146 N. E. 2d 301, and the…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Sayre v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1967
- Scott v. City of Columbus Department of Public UtilitiesOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Haas v. HayslipOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Thacker v. Board of TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
- Sears v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.