Rogers v. Raynor
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Donovan, J.) Trover. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiffs were partners in a venture involving the publication and sale of a book. It was the principal business of Thorpe, but not of Rogers. In furtherance of their venture, they delivered to Kaynor & Taylor, copartners, a quantity of paper and electrotype plates, under a contract by which they were to do the press work for $300. Subsequently, this contract was modified so as to include the binding of the books. Raynor & Taylor performed the labor, and delivered upwards of 5,000 of the books, but retained about 500 finished volumes and some unbound sheets, and about 5 reams of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Russell v. LennonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Skinner v. ShannonMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- McCoy v. BrennanMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sahlberg v. J. A. Teague Furn. Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Boyle v. WalshMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Gottesman v. ChipmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1900