Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Raynor

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Donovan, J.) Trover. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiffs were partners in a venture involving the publication and sale of a book. It was the principal business of Thorpe, but not of Rogers. In furtherance of their venture, they delivered to Kaynor & Taylor, copartners, a quantity of paper and electrotype plates, under a contract by which they were to do the press work for $300. Subsequently, this contract was modified so as to include the binding of the books. Raynor & Taylor performed the labor, and delivered upwards of 5,000 of the books, but retained about 500 finished volumes and some unbound sheets, and about 5 reams of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Russell v. LennonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Skinner v. ShannonMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. McCoy v. BrennanMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sahlberg v. J. A. Teague Furn. Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. Boyle v. WalshMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Gottesman v. ChipmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API