Legal Opinion

Skinner v. Shannon

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1880PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error to Shiawassee. Trover. Plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, C. J.

"Where a levy is made upon a stock of goods of a copartnership, is the firm as such, or the several members thereof, entitled to claim any part thereof as being exempt under the law of this State ?

This question has arisen in several of the States, and thus far there is a want of harmony in the answers given thereto. *87We must, therefore, in the light of those cases, look to the Constitution, statutes aud decisions of this State, and unfettered by previous decisions, construe the statute in accordance with the letter and evident spirit thereof.

Our Constitution, in section 1 of art. xvi, provides…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lozo v. SutherlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Stewart v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  3. Russell v. LennonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Stewart v. WeltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Barber v. RorabeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ball v. TompkinsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1890
  2. King v. WelbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Noyes v. BeldingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Waite v. MathewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Goudy v. WerbeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API