Gottesman v. Chipman
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Replevin by Max Gottesman and Jacob Schnabel, co-partners as Gottesman & Schnabel, against Harry F. Chipman, sheriff, Daniel J. Spinning, constable, and Archie H. Jackson and Joseph F. Jacobs, copartners as Jackson & Jacobs. From a judgment for defendants on verdict directed by the court, plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiffs were copartners engaged in the clothing trade. On October 11, 1898, Berman, Wein & Co. attached their stock; defendant Spinning, a constable, making the levy and taking possession. Abraham Jacobs was left in charge. On October 14th, Spinning inventoried the stock, and had it appraised. It amounted to $666.68. On the same day Spinning levied an attachment upon the property, subject to the Berman, Wein & Co. attachment, in behalf of Jackson & Jacobs, seizing goods amounting to $134.50. These goods are described in the record, and include nine ulsters. On October 19th, M. King &…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Russell v. LennonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Lillibridge v. WalshMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Rogers v. RaynorMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Lillibridge v. WalshMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by1 opinion
- Youdan v. KelleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1934