Legal Opinion

McCoy v. Brennan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1886PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Bay. (G-reen, J.) Trover. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion and head-notes.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

As sheriff of Bay county, defendant levied upon a stock of goods belonging to the firm of E. McCoy & Co., composed of the plaintiff, Elizabeth McCoy, and her two sons, William and Robert McCoy.

Elizabeth was a married woman, and resided with her husband in West Bay City.

The business of the firm was carried on at Pinconning, about twenty miles from the place where plaintiff resided, by the other two members of the firm. The partnership was formed in February, 1884. The plaintiff was a general partner, and prior to the levy she had drawn from the assets of the firm, from time to time, in money,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Skinner v. ShannonMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Newton v. HoweWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. WhitmoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. In re Andrews & SimondsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1911
  3. Dennis v. Kass & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Cowan v. Their CreditorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. In re ClarkDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API