Legal Opinion

Boyle v. Walsh

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Replevin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment in a case of replevin from an officer of a horse,' buggy, and harness, which the defendant held upon a levy of execution issued against the plqintiff, which property-plaintiff claims to have been exempt from levy and sale' on execution. The cause was tried before the circuit judge, who filed a written finding of fact that the propT erty belonged to the plaintiff, was worth $200,. and was not exempt from execution, levy, and sale, • because it-was purchased by the plaintiff for speculative purposes1 only, in exchange for patent-right territory,…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. O'Donnell v. SegarMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Stilson v. GibbsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Skinner v. ShannonMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Waite v. MathewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. People v. ClementsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gollnick v. MarvinOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Walton v. RyanMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API