Boyle v. Walsh
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Replevin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment in a case of replevin from an officer of a horse,' buggy, and harness, which the defendant held upon a levy of execution issued against the plqintiff, which property-plaintiff claims to have been exempt from levy and sale' on execution. The cause was tried before the circuit judge, who filed a written finding of fact that the propT erty belonged to the plaintiff, was worth $200,. and was not exempt from execution, levy, and sale, • because it-was purchased by the plaintiff for speculative purposes1 only, in exchange for patent-right territory,…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- O'Donnell v. SegarMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Stilson v. GibbsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Skinner v. ShannonMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Waite v. MathewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- People v. ClementsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gollnick v. MarvinOregon Supreme Court · 1911
- Walton v. RyanMichigan Supreme Court · 1905