Legal Opinion

Sexton v. Dunlap

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1966No. 30,414PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, J.

This is an appeal from a denial by the Special Judge in the Monroe Circuit Court of the injunctive relief sought by appellants in a class action pending therein.

The issues for the trial court to determine were (1) whether a permanent injunction should issue against the appellees in their respective capacities of Mayor and Redevelopment Com*344missioners of the City of Bloomington, enjoining them from continuing with a specified project for the redevelopment of a certain area in that City, undertaken pursuant to the Redevelopment of Cities and Towns Act of 1953, as amended, which injunction was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Public Service Commission v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  2. City of East Chicago v. Sinclair Refining Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
  3. City of South Bend v. MarckleIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Alanel Corp. v. Indianapolis Redevelopment CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Hibben v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Board of Sanitary Commissioners v. Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Sexton v. DunlapIndiana Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Suttmiller v. City of Batesville, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Suttmiller v. City of Batesville, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API