Legal Opinion

Suttmiller v. City of Batesville, Etc.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1967No. 30,973Published

1Opinion of the Court

248 Ind. 391 (1967)

226 N.E.2d 893

SUTTMILLER ET AL.

v.

CITY OF BATESVILLE, ETC.

No. 30,973.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

Filed June 9, 1967.

Rehearing denied September 18, 1967.

George Rose, of Indianapolis, for appellants.

Paul V. Wycoff, of Batesville, Harry T. Ice and James E. Hawes, Jr., both of Indianapolis, and Ice Miller Donadio & Ryan, of counsel, of Indianapolis, all for appellee.

HUNTER, C.J.

This is an appeal from the appointment of appraisers and the overruling of objections to a complaint in a condemnation action brought under the provisions of the Redevelopment of Cities and Towns Act of…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Mote; Concurrence · Arterburn.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of East Chicago v. Sinclair Refining Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Cemetery Co. v. Warren School TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Mann v. CITY OF TERRE HAUTEIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Prunk v. Indianapolis Redevelopment CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Suttmiller v. City of Batesville, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API