Legal Opinion
City of South Bend v. Marckle
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 1939No. 27,032PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShake, J.
The appellees instituted this proceeding under our Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act (ch. 81, Acts 1927, §3-1101, et seq., Burns’ .Ann. St. 1933, §438, et seq., Baldwin’s Ind. St. 1934). The complaint is in a single paragraph and alleges in substance that the appellees are the owners of three contiguous lots located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Diamond Avenue and Lincoln Way West in the city of South Bend, Indiana; that said city has a general zoning ordinance, which is set out in full in the complaint and which purports on its. face to have been adopted pursuant to chapter…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Board of Zoning Appeals v. WaintrupIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935
- O'Connor v. Overall Laundry, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1932
- Civil City of Indianapolis v. Ostrom Realty & Construction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1931
3Cited by38 opinions
- Bright v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
- City of East Chicago v. Sinclair Refining Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Poe v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Snyder v. City of LakewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Keeling v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.