Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sexton v. Dunlap

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1966No. 30,414Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion

Arterburn, J.

The appellants sought a permanent injunction in the trial court to stop a so-called Urban Renewal Program by the City of Bloomington. (Redevelopment of Cities & Towns Act of 1953 as amended Acts 1957). The appellant owners of homes within the area described as “blighted,” claim the city failed to follow the statute in the preliminary proceedings under which hearings were to be held and a record made which determined that the appellants’ property was “blighted.”

Plaintiffs’ position secondly is that even if the defendant municipal corporation had complied with the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cemetery Co. v. Warren School TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Alanel Corp. v. Indianapolis Redevelopment CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  3. McCOY v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE, ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Sexton v. DunlapIndiana Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API