City of East Chicago v. Sinclair Refining Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Appellee has continuously, since the year 1916, owned and operated within the limits of appellant city an industrial plant for the manufacturé and refining of petroleum products. In September of 1919 appellee purchased additional land adjacent to its plant and referred to in the complaint herein as Parcel No. 1 containing 8.118 acres, and Parcel No. 2 containing 24.244 acres, for. the sole and only purpose of industrial use in connection with the development and expansion of its industrial plant. The exact location of said Parcels 1 and 2 in relation to surrounding property is best shown by…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Matter of Otto v. SteinhilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Devereux Foundation, Inc., Zoning CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Goodwin v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Snyder v. City of LakewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Bd. of Zoning Ap. of Decatur v. Decatur, Ind. Co. of Jehovah's WitnessesIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
- TOWN OF HOMECROFT v. MacBethIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
- South Bend Federation of Teachers v. National Education Ass'n-South BendIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Town of Beverly Shores v. BagnallIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.