Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Ulrich

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1949No. Docket No. 34, Calendar No. 44,445PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

Plaintiffs sued the defendant in the circuit court for Kent county in an action of trespass on the .case for damages, claiming that the defendant had defrauded plaintiffs in a transaction for the sale and purchase of a house. The gist of plaintiffs’ claim is that the defendant fraudulently concealed the fact that the house was infested with termites, and misrepresented the facts in that regard. The case wa.s tried by the court without a jury, resulting in a judgment of no cause for action, from which the plaintiffs appeal.

Defendant first listed her home for sale in July, 1946. The house had…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Holcomb v. NobleMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Busch v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Groening v. OpsataMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Wolfe v. A. E. Kusterer & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Kenyon v. WoodruffMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. M&D, INC v. McCONKEYMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Bethlahmy v. BechtelIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Hord v. Environmental Research InstituteMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Borman's, Inc. v. Lake State Development Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Fegeas v. SherrillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API