Legal Opinion

Holcomb v. Noble

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1888PublishedCited by 46 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Jennison, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This action is on the case to recover damages for misrepresentation of the value and quality of certain lands. The plaintiff was shown to have been deceived, to his damage, concerning the lands, and there is no real dispute concerning it. The only defense which has any plausibility is that no actual fraud was intended.

The fact that the declaration contains charges of fraudulent and deceitful purposes does not in itself have any bearing on this question, or compel plaintiff to prove it. Such allegations were contained formerly in nearly every action on the case, and are of no more importance…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baughman v. GouldMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Titan Insurance Company v. HytenMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Mark Schwartz v. Electronic Data Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. Aldrich v. ScribnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Boddy v. HenrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1901

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API