Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Randall
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided November 30, 1932No. 23463PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.
Newell Randall recovered a judgment in the court of common pleas of Ashtabula county, Ohio, against Raymond Anderson for personal injuries due to Anderson’s negligence while operating an automobile. Prior thereto, the Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company issued to one Stevenson, the owner of the automobile, a policy of liability insurance which covered not only the owner, but also any one driving the automobile with his permission. After recovering the judgment against Anderson, this action was brought against the insurance company under favor of Section 9510-4, Q-eneral Code, which provides…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stacey v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
- Bachman v. Independence Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Slavens v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Lowe v. . Fidelity and Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. of New York v. ColthurstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Sanderson v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- Curran v. Connecticut Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Northwestern Mutual Insurance Co. v. Independence Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- Burr v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.