Bachman v. Independence Indemnity Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This is an action to recover from an insurance carrier the amount of a judgment rendered against the insured in favor of a guest injured while riding in an automobile. Respondent recovered judgment from the insurance carrier by whom this appeal is prosecuted.
Katie Bachman was the owner of the automobile in question and the insured named in the policy of public liability indemnity insurance written by appellant to indemnify her against loss following accidental…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Rushing v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Anderson v. EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Malmgren v. Southwestern Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Finkelberg v. Continental Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Hynding v. Home Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Sanderson v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- Bonfils v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Purefoy v. Pacific Automobile Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. RandallOhio Supreme Court · 1932
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.