Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. of New York v. Colthurst

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1929No. 5823PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.

Upon the facts, which are stipulated, the general question for consideration is whether the appellee, who was injured in an automobile accident in California resulting from the negligence of the owner of the automobile, is entitled to recover damages on account of the injury from the carrier of a poliey of insurance. One Harris was the owner of the automobile, and to him, on May 1, 1926, the appellant issued the poliey in question, which was written in California and was in force on June 15,1926, when the accident occurred. Among other things, it provides that “the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Malmgren v. Southwestern Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Finkelberg v. Continental Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Schoenfeld v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. Stacey v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. Davis' AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hoosier Cas. Co. of Indianapolis, Ind. v. FoxDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. RandallOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corporation v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. WyerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  5. Royal Indemnity Co. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API