Legal Opinion

Slavens v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. of Detroit

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 6, 1928No. 5385PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). It is urged as ground of demurrer that the plaintiff does not bring himself within the terms of the policy, in that he fails to allege that the notice required by the policy was given to the defendant. The policy provided indemnity, first; to Ernst, the named assured, against loss from liability imposed by law upon him for damages on account of bodily injuries; second, it bound the defendant to indemnify, “in the same manner and under the same conditions as the named assured is indemnified hereunder, any person or persons while riding in or legally…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gorrell v. Greensboro Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. Ayres v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  3. Anoka Lumber Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  4. Finkelberg v. Continental Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. PeppardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Quinlan v. Liberty Bank and Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. RandallOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  3. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  4. Michel v. American Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
  5. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co. v. PlummerDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1935

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API