Legal Opinion

Freddy Curiel v. Amy Miller

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 25, 2016No. 11-56949PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FREDDY CURIEL, No. 11-56949 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. v. No. 8:10-cv-00301- DDP-FMO AMY MILLER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dean D. Pregerson, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted En Banc March 23, 2016 San Francisco, California Filed July 25, 2016 Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Judge, and Stephen Reinhardt, Barry G. Silverman, Susan P. Graber, Ronald M. Gould, Richard A. Paez, Jay S. Bybee, Mary H. Murguia, Andrew D.…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tracy Petrocelli v. Renee BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. (HC) Smith v. LizzaragaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  3. Willard Hall v. F. HawsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API