Legal Opinion

(HC) Smith v. Lizzaraga

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 1, 2019No. 2:18-cv-00064Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JIMMY DON SMITH, No. 2:18-CV-0064-KJM-DMC-P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 JOE LIZZARAGA, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of 18 habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is respondent’s motion to 19 dismiss the petition (ECF No. 10) as time bared because it was filed past the one-year statute of 20 limitations period. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 21 Eastern…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stephen Charles FORDE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Samuel Quinton Bonner v. Tom Carey, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Velasquez v. KirklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Samuel Quinton Bonner v. Tom Carey, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API