Legal Opinion

Callaham v. Thurmond

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 30, 1918No. 6333PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from County Court, Roger Mills County; W. H. Mouser, Judge. Action by I. C. Thurmond against Prank W. Callaham and another. Motion to strike certain paragraphs of the answer sustained, and defendants bring- error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HOOKER, C.

The defendant in error on the 10th day of July, 1913, commenced his action in the county court of Roger Mills county against the plaintiffs in error to recover a judgment upon a promissory note alleged to have been executed and delivered by them to him on the 19th day of February, 1912, whereby they promised on December 1, 1912, to pay to him, the said I. C. Thurmond, the sum of $560.63, with interest at the rate of 10 per cent, per annum after maturity, and the further sum of $60 as attorney fees in the event said note was placed in the hands of an attorney for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Friend v. Southern States Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Myatt v. Ponca City Land and Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  3. Anderson v. TatroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Bank of Tuttle v. GordonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ruby v. WarriorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API