Bank of Tuttle v. Gordon
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Grady County; Frank AT. Bailey, Judge. Action by M. V. Gordon against the Bank of Tuttle, a corporation. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.
Defendant in error brought suit in the district court of Grady county against the plaintiff in error to recover cei’r tain usury alleged to have been paid by him. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $228, being double the amount of interest paid and $35 as an attorney’s fee, and defendant prosecutes error.
The first and main contention of de: fondant is that there was no legal demand for the return of the usury paid, and that without such, demand plaintiff could niot maintain this action. The notice…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- First National Bank of Jacksboro v. LasaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Brown v. Marion National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Driesbach v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Miller v. Oklahoma State Bank of AltusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Anderson v. TatroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ruby v. WarriorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Elson v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Callaham v. ThurmondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918