Anderson v. Tatro
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Custer County; Action by G. M. Anderson against Joseph Tatro. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RITTENHOUSE, C.
On January 18, 1909, G. M. Anderson, plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff below, borrowed from Joseph Tatro, defendant in error, who was defendant below, the sum of $600,. and gave his note of that date for $690 due in one year. No payments whatever, either of principal or interest, were ever made on this note; but on January 18, 1910, when the note fell due, it was taken up by the giving of a new note in the sum of $762.45, it being admitted that interest was computed' at the rate of eighteen per cent, for seven months, and the new note was transferred to the Custer…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- First National Bank of Jacksboro v. LasaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Barnet v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Brown v. Marion National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- McBroom v. Scottish Mortgage & Land Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Driesbach v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ruby v. WarriorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Union Savings Ass'n v. CumminsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Elson v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Liebelt v. CarneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Ionic Petroleum, Limited v. Third Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.