Legal Opinion
184 Windsor Avenue, LLC. v. State
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 5, 2005No. SC 17243PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The plaintiff, 184 Windsor Avenue, LLC, brought this action for damages and declaratory relief against the defendant, the state of Connecticut, alleging that the state’s failure to pay rent due under the tax escalation clause of a lease agreement between the parties constituted a breach of contract and an uncompensated taking in violation of the federal and state constitutions. The trial court dismissed the action, concluding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the plaintiffs action was barred by sovereign immunity. On appeal, 2 the plaintiff contends that the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- J. A. Sullivan Corp. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Catalina Development, Inc. v. County of El PasoTexas Supreme Court · 2003
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Violano v. FernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Columbia Air Services, Inc. v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Turner v. BoyleDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. LawSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- C. R. Klewin Northeast, LLC v. FlemingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.