McNaughton v. Smith
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Hillsdale; Chester, J. Case by Kent McNaughton against George N. Smith, impleaded with Albert B. Cummins, for the fraudulent conversion of certain corporate stock. From a judgment •for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.
It is the claim of plaintiff that George N. Smith, Albert B. Cummins, and George M. Swaney entered into a conspiracy to defraud him of his stock in the Omega Portland Cement Company, and that, by means of fraudulent statements made by them to Delmar McNaughton, his half-brother and agent, they obtained possession of said stock, and fraudulently converted it. This suit was brought to recover the value of said stock. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant Smith has brought the case here by writ of error. The-record is quite a long one. There are 58 assignments of error. So…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- O'Donnell v. SegarMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Watkins v. WallaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Morgan v. AndrewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Ferris v. McQueenMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Gumberg v. TreuschMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sanchez v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Mina v. General Star Indemnity Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Burgdorfer v. ThielemannOregon Supreme Court · 1936
- Silverstone v. London Assurance Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Schmidt v. BarclayMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.