Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Barclay

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1910No. Docket No. 79PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Murphy, J. Bill by Ida W. Schmidt against William L. Barclay to have a deed absolute in form declared to be a mortgage. From a decree for complainant, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The trial judge filed a written opinion in this case, from which we quote as follows:

*2“ The complainant herein seeks relief appropriate to the theory that a deed, absolute in form, executed and delivered by her to the defendant upon July 15, 1905, was mutually intended to be, and in legal effect is, a mortgage. She filed her bill of complaint April 24, 1908. Amended bills were subsequently filed as of the respective dates May-23, 1908, February 11, 1909, and March 16, 1909, the last-mentioned one, the only one signed by the complainant herself, being filed during the progress of the hearing.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. O'Donnell v. SegarMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Watkins v. WallaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Shields v. JacobMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. McMillan v. BissellMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Rabeke v. BaerMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MasonSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  2. Dean v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Ellis v. Wayne Real Estate Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Brennan v. FinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Ferd L. Alpert Industries, Inc. v. Oakland Metal Stamping Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API