Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. Barclay
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 1, 1910No. Docket No. 79PublishedCited by 14 opinions
Appeal from Wayne; Murphy, J. Bill by Ida W. Schmidt against William L. Barclay to have a deed absolute in form declared to be a mortgage. From a decree for complainant, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The trial judge filed a written opinion in this case, from which we quote as follows:
*2“ The complainant herein seeks relief appropriate to the theory that a deed, absolute in form, executed and delivered by her to the defendant upon July 15, 1905, was mutually intended to be, and in legal effect is, a mortgage. She filed her bill of complaint April 24, 1908. Amended bills were subsequently filed as of the respective dates May-23, 1908, February 11, 1909, and March 16, 1909, the last-mentioned one, the only one signed by the complainant herself, being filed during the progress of the hearing.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- O'Donnell v. SegarMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Watkins v. WallaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Shields v. JacobMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- McMillan v. BissellMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Rabeke v. BaerMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mitchell v. MasonSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
- Dean v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- Ellis v. Wayne Real Estate Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Brennan v. FinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Ferd L. Alpert Industries, Inc. v. Oakland Metal Stamping Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.