Legal Opinion

DeHart v. North Carolina Department of Transportation

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 17, 2009No. COA08-216PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Plaintiffs Allen Charles DeHart and Luearttie DeHart appeal from the trial court’s dismissal of their claim for inverse condemnation arising out of the failure of the North Carolina Department of Transportation (“DOT”) to grade their driveway at a slope of no more than- 10 percent after widening a highway running past plaintiffs’ property. Because plaintiffs have not established that they were substantially deprived of the use of their property by DOT’S actions, we affirm the trial court’s order.

Facts

Plaintiffs own a tract of land in Graham County, North Carolina. In 1998, DOT…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Combs & Associates, Inc. v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Department of Transportation v. RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Lea Co. v. North Carolina Board of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY COM'N v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. North Carolina Department of Transportation v. Stagecoach VillageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. TOWN OF APEX v. WhitehurstCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. City of Wilson v. Batten Family, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Dep't of Transp. v. Bloomsbury Ests., LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2024
  4. Elliott v. Dep't of Transp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API