TOWN OF APEX v. Whitehurst
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STROUD, Judge.
Defendants appeal three orders regarding the condemnation of their land. As defendants’ appeal is untimely, we dismiss the appeal.
I. Background
Plaintiff, the Town of Apex (“Apex”), brought this condemnation action pursuant to “Article 9 of Chapter 136 of the North Carolina General Statutes” 1 because it was “necessary to condemn and appropriate” the property of defendants “for public use in the construction of a certain gravity sewer line project[.]” The parties were “unable to agree as to the purchase price of the property... appropriated^]” and thus Apex requested the Court to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Dogwood Development & Management Co. LLC v. White Oak Transport Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
- Penn v. Carolina Virginia Coastal Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY COM'N v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Concrete MacHinery Co. v. City of HickoryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wilkie v. City of Boiling Spring LakesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
- Town of Nags Head v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Wilkie v. City of Boiling Spring LakesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Dep't of Transp. v. RiddleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- Cty. of Moore v. AcresCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.