Legal Opinion

North Carolina Department of Transportation v. Stagecoach Village

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 2005No. 529PA04PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether an interlocutory order joining 106 alleged interest holders as necessary parties to a condemnation action is immediately appealable. We hold it is and therefore vacate and remand to the Court of Appeals.

Defendant, a North Carolina non-profit corporation, is the homeowners’ association for a townhouse development in Guilford County. On 15 January 2002, plaintiff initiated condemnation proceedings for 41,849 square feet (less than one acre) of the 20 acres of common area owned by defendant. In its answer, defendant asserted the development’s 106…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Department of Transportation v. RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Borders v. YarbroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY COM'N v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. North Carolina Department of Transportation v. Stagecoach VillageCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Stanford v. ParisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  2. Beroth Oil Co. v. N.C. Dep't of Transp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  3. Watson v. Millers Creek Lumber Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. City of Charlotte v. BMJ OF CHARLOTTE, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. City of Wilson v. Batten Family, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API