Legal Opinion

Zupancic Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 1958No. Appeal, No. 56PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

This is an appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review holding that the claimant voluntarily terminated his employment without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature and was disqualified from receiving benefits under the provisions of Section 402 (b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law of December 5, 1936, P. L. 2897, as amended, 43 PS §802 (b).

Section 402 (b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802 (b) provides that, “An employe shall be ineligible for compensation in any week— (b) In which his unemployment is due to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Sweeney Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Rabinowitz Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Goldstein Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Shellhammer v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Clark v. Bogus Basin Recreational AssociationIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Putnam v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1961
  3. Bateman v. Howard Johnson CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  4. Boob v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Szojka Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API