Legal Opinion

Shellhammer v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1947No. Appeal, 60PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ross, J.,

This is an appeal by the claimant, Sarah E. Shell-hammer, from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review disallowing compensation on the ground that the claimant was not available for work as required by section 401(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law of Dec. 5, 1936, P. L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 PS 801.

In discussing the availability requirement of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Judge Reno, in Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation Case, 158 Pa. Superior Ct. 548, 45 A. 2d 898, at page 560 et seq,, stated: “The act provides (section 401, 43 PS…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Teicher Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mattey v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Mohler v. Department of LaborIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Claim of SappIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Erie Resistor Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Miles v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API