Sweeney Unemployment Compensation Case
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, P. J.,
The question raised by this appeal in an unemployment compensation case is whether claimant and 144 others, similarly situated, were disqualified to receive unemployment compensation benefits for the weeks involved because of their refusal, without good cause, to accept suitable work. Claimants were found ineli*245gible to receive benefits for the claim weeks following their refusal to accept offered employment.
Section 402 (a) of the Unemployment Compensation Law of 1936, as amended, 43 PS §802 (a), provides: “An employe shall be ineligible for compensation for any week —…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barclay White Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Suska Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Suska Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Hanna Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Lattanzio v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Bentz Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Johnston v. Chrysler CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
- Pompa Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Zupancic Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.