Legal Opinion
Yale Hook & Eye Co. v. Interwoven Hook & Eye Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 22, 1929No. 3806PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This is a suit in equity in which the relief prayed for is an injunction and damages for the alleged infringement by the defendants of patent No. 1,605,902, issued by the United State Patent Office to Leo Rosaninan, for sewing machine, dated November 2, 1926.
The patentee has since changed his name to Roseman, and the patent has been assigned to the plaintiff* whose title is not questioned.
The defendant David Silberman is the president of the defendant Interwoven Hook & Eye Company.
The defense is noninfringement.
The suit is based on elaims 1, 6, and 29 of the patent in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- International Time Recording Co. v. W. H. Bundy Recording Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
- Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. v. Gould Coupler Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1917
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hazeltine Corporation v. Radio Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Penmac Corporation v. Esterbrook Steel Pen Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Van Brode Milling Co. v. Cox Air Gauge System, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1958
- Less Car Load Lots Co. v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1935