Legal Opinion
Van Brode Milling Co. v. Cox Air Gauge System, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 21, 1958No. 1045-57PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, Chief Judge.
Involved in this litigation are validity and infringement1 of Coleman Patent No. 2,710,660 filed December 10, 1951 and issued June 14, 1955, for “a battery hold-down frame of synthetic rubber resin material”. The chief objects of the invention are stated in the specifications in this manner:
“The main object of the present invention is to provide a hold-down frame made of a material strong *438enough to resist deformation under tension of the bolts by means of which the hold-down frame is clamped against the battery top, and possessing sufficient resiliency effectively to…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grinnell Corp. v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc. v. Whiting Milk Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
- Grinnell Corporation v. Virginia Electric & Power CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968