Legal Opinion
Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. v. Gould Coupler Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided September 11, 1917No. 153-BPublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Equity. Suit by the Safety Car Heating & Righting Company against the Gould Coupler Company.
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
The John L. Creveling patent in issue, No. 747,686, granted December 22, 1903, for a system of .electrical regulation, has heretofore been considered by this court, and held infringed, in an action brought by the plaintiff herein against the United States Light & Heating Company (222 Fed. 310, affirmed 223 Fed. 1023, — C. C. A. —), and held not infringed in a case against its successor, the United States Light & Heat Corporation; it being shown in the latter case that defendant had not used Creveling’s constant output generator regulator, but had adapted a so-called…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Beach v. HobbsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1897
- Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. v. United States Light & Heating Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1914
- Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. v. United States Lighting & Heating Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. v. Gould Coupler Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1915
- Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. v. Gould Coupler Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carson Inv. Co. v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Yale Hook & Eye Co. v. Interwoven Hook & Eye Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1929
- Kammerdiner v. S. R. Bowen Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1933
- Carson Inv. Co. v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928