Legal Opinion
Less Car Load Lots Co. v. Pennsylvania R.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 2, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
My decision in this case is that the bill of complaint be dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the claims on which it is founded are invalid for want of invention.
I. This cause is based on the following claims of three hitherto unadjudicated patents : Claims 12 to 22, inclusive, of reissue patent No. Re. 16,073, claim 6 of United States patent No. 1,564,285, and claim 9, of United States patent No. 1,650,661.
There is not any question herein either of jurisdiction or of venue. The incorporation of the parties and the locus standi of the plaintiffs is not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hailes v. Van WormerSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. Locomotive Engine Safety Truck Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- DeForest Radio Co. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Hazeltine Corporation v. Radio Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smith v. Dravo Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Knaust Bros. v. GoldschlagDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939