Legal Opinion
Crummere v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 31, 1985No. 85 Civ. 1376 (RWS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Now pending in this securities case are motions on behalf of the individual defendants Michael Brown (“Brown”) pro se, Frank Caverretta (“Caverretta”), Jackie Johnston (“Johnston”), and the two securities firm defendants, Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc. (“Smith Barney”) and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (“Merrill Lynch”), to dismiss the amended complaint of plaintiff Marie Crummere (“Crummere”) for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction, failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and for failure to plead fraud with…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Miree v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Birnbaum v. Newport Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Savino v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Ames Department Stores Inc. Stock LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Perez-Rubio v. WyckoffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Vis Vires Group, Inc. v. Endonovo Therapeutics, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Harrison v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.