Legal Opinion
Harrison v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 28, 1989No. 86 C 8003PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BRIAN BARNETT DUFF, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Hudson T. Harrison and Hudson T. Harrison, Inc. have sued Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (“Dean Witter”) and two of its broker-dealers, John M. Carpenter and John G. Kenning, under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“the Securities Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) (“§ 10(b)”), § 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78t(a) (“§ 20(a)”), the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 et seq., and a number of state laws. Dean Witter has moved for summary judgment on all…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Inc. v. Hydrolevel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Rozny v. MarnulIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Harrison v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- 2314 Lincoln Park West Condominium Ass'n v. Mann, Gin, Ebel & Frazier, Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Reshal Associates, Inc. v. Long Grove Trading Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Sphere Drake Insurance v. All American Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- Semrad v. Edina Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.