State v. Bruce
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Justice.
Defendant was charged with making and passing a worthless check for $1,075 for which he received titles to six used cars. The transaction occurred September 14, 1951; the check was postdated to September 17th. The court granted a motion to dismiss made by defendant and the State appeals to present to this court the question, whether a postdated check falls within the provisions of our bad check statute.1
It apparently has been too generally assumed that the fact that a check is postdated is an invariable and absolute defense to a criminal charge for making and passing it.’…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- State v. HowdUtah Supreme Court · 1920
- Hull v. FlindersUtah Supreme Court · 1933
- Nielson v. Leamington Mines & Exploration Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1935
- State v. TrogstadUtah Supreme Court · 1940
3Cited by18 opinions
- Von Hake v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Berkeley Bank for Cooperatives v. MeibosUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Gumm v. HeiderOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Cerritos Trucking Co. v. Utah Venture No. 1Utah Supreme Court · 1982
- Fleming v. Fleming-Felt CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.