Legal Opinion

State v. Bruce

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1953No. 7830PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Defendant was charged with making and passing a worthless check for $1,075 for which he received titles to six used cars. The transaction occurred September 14, 1951; the check was postdated to September 17th. The court granted a motion to dismiss made by defendant and the State appeals to present to this court the question, whether a postdated check falls within the provisions of our bad check statute.1

It apparently has been too generally assumed that the fact that a check is postdated is an invariable and absolute defense to a criminal charge for making and passing it.’…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  2. State v. HowdUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Hull v. FlindersUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Nielson v. Leamington Mines & Exploration Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State v. TrogstadUtah Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Von Hake v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Berkeley Bank for Cooperatives v. MeibosUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Gumm v. HeiderOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Cerritos Trucking Co. v. Utah Venture No. 1Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Fleming v. Fleming-Felt CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API