Legal Opinion

State v. Howd

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1920No. 3402PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Grand County, Seventh District; Geo. Christensen, Judge. James C. Howd was convicted of obtaining property by false pretenses, and be appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorfman, C. J.

The defendant was tried and convicted before the district court for Grand county of having obtained certain personal property by fraudulent and false pretenses. He appeals.

The defendant sets forth and complains on appeal of many alleged errors as grounds for reversal, among them that defendant did not have a preliminary examination, nor was it waived, before the committing magistrate as to the charge made against him in the information upon which he was tried and convicted in the district court.

*529For tbe purposes of this opinion we do not, however, deem it necessary to discuss or pass upon the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MillsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1840
  2. Colly v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  3. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Commonwealth v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Chaplin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  3. State v. SorensenUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. JacobsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. State v. BruceUtah Supreme Court · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API