Legal Opinion

Gumm v. Heider

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1960PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This is an action for malicious prosecution. The plaintiff had a verdict and judgment for $25,000 general damages and $5,000 punitive damages, and the defendant has appealed.

The following, we believe, is a sufficient statement *10of the facts for an understanding of the questions raised by the assignments of error.

•' On July 15, 1953, the plaintiff was indebted to the defendant in the conceded sum of $630.00, and, as the defendant claims, in an additional sum of -at least $170.00. The indebtedness was secured by the certificate of title of a Chevrolet truck which was in the possession of the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State of Oregon v. PirkeyOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Halberstadt v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Van Lom v. SchneidermanOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. State v. HammelsyOregon Supreme Court · 1908

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Murphy v. LynnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  2. Alvarez v. Retail Credit Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Gowin v. HeiderOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Gustafson v. Payless Drug Stores Northwest, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1964

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API