Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Fleming-Felt Company

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1958No. 8732PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

This is a suit by A. Fred Fleming to extricate himself from difficulties arising out of a merger of his auto supply business with that of the defendants, Joseph H. and Marie Felt. Plaintiff based his action upon: (1) claims of fraud by the defendants in inducing him to enter into the transaction, and (2) alleged breaches of their contractual obligations thereafter. The trial court found for Fleming on both issues. Defendant’s appeal, insisting that the evidence does not support either the finding of fraud or that they were at fault in causing the disruption of the business…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pace v. ParrishUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Ephraim Theatre Company v. HawkUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  3. LaHue v. Coca Cola Bottling, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Sprague v. Boyles Bros. Drilling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Buehner Block Company v. GlezosUtah Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. De Vas v. NobleUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Spann v. American Express Travel Related Services Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  3. Ostertag v. La MontUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Walker v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Schow v. Guardtone, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API