Legal Opinion
Harden v. Dayton, 22072 (3-28-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 28, 2008No. 22072PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Plaintiff, Charles Harden, appeals from an order entered pursuant to Civ.R. 41(B)(1), dismissing Harden's action against Defendant, Andrew Clark, for Harden's failure to prosecute.
{¶ 2} On January 9, 2003, Harden committed an armed robbery at River Valley Credit Union in West Carrollton. Harden fled the scene in a white Chevrolet with another armed robber. The police pursued the armed robbers in what turned out to be a high speed chase. The pursuit began in West Carrollton and proceeded into Dayton.
{¶ 3} Clark was a police officer for the City of Dayton and was on duty on January…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Reginald Lacroix Poole v. Larry LambertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Gary William Holt v. Jerry Pitts, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Heidelberg v. HammerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Jones v. HartranftOhio Supreme Court · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Schaub, 22419 (9-19-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Shamblin v. Bob Evans Farms, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Sankey v. FasanoOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Childs v. Midwest Laundry Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Russell v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2016