Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Schaub, 22419 (9-19-2008)

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Richard Schaub appeals from a judgment overruling his motion for relief from judgment. Schaub contends that the trial court abused its discretion in overruling the motion because his circumstances and incarceration rendered him incompetent and unable to defend against claims asserted by plaintiffs-appellees Cincinnati Insurance Company, David Thompsen, and Beverly Thompsen.1 Schaub also contends that the trial court erred in refusing to grant relief from judgment, because the motion was supported by sufficient evidence.

{¶ 2} We conclude that the trial court…