Legal Opinion

Heidelberg v. Hammer

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 8, 1978No. 75-2051PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TONE, Circuit Judge.

We are called upon to review the District Court’s award of damages under a superse-deas bond in a fair housing case. Plaintiffs complain that the award was inadequate in certain respects. We modify it in part.

This action began in April 1974 when Stanley and Judith Moore, black citizens of the United States, filed a complaint based on 42 U.S.C. §§ 1982 and 3604 alleging that they had entered into an agreement to buy a house owned by Mrs. Mary Ryan Townsend and that Mrs. Townsend and Jane Melnick, the exclusive sales agent for the property, subsequently had refused to sell…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reinecke v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Kountze v. Omaha Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. United States Steel Corporation v. LampCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  4. Stanley Moore and Judith Moore v. Mary Ryan Townsend and Jane MelnickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  5. American Trust Co. v. Speers Sand & Clay Works, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1932

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Rose v. BartleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. 30.64 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Klickitat County, State of Washington, and James StarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Greg Myers, Etc. v. R. Kathleen Morris, Scott County Attorney, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  4. Jay Dee Jackson v. County of McLean Steve Brenin, Gary Plonse, and David GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Emmett Ray McCarthy v. Dr. F. Weinberg, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API