Jones v. Hartranft
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.
With this case we hold that a trial court does not abuse its discretion in dismissing a claim with prejudice under Civ.R. 41(B)(1) when a plaintiff, who has had an objectively reasonable amount of time for discovery, fails to proceed upon a scheduled trial date for want of evidence of defendant’s liability.
DISMISSAL UNDER CIV. R. 41(B)(1)
Civ.R. 41(B)(1) provides that “[w]here the plaintiff fails to prosecute, * * * the court upon motion of a defendant or on its own motion may, after notice to the plaintiffs counsel, dismiss an action or claim.”2 A dismissal for failure to prosecute “operates…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Tokles & Son, Inc. v. Midwestern Indemnity Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- Pembaur v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Toney v. BerkemerOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Industrial Risk Insurers v. Lorenz Equipment Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Quonset Hut, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
- Sazima v. ChalkoOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Heimberger v. Zeal Hotel Group, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Simeone v. Girard City Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Thomas v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.