Legal Opinion
Bornstein v. J.C. Penney Life Insurance
District Court, C.D. California
Decided November 27, 1996No. CV 96-1829 ER (BQRx)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
RAFEEDIE, District Judge.
The Court has read and considered defendant J.C. Penney’s Motion for Summary Judgment, the opposing papers thereto, the reply, and all other matters before the Court. This matter came on for hearing on Novem ber 4,1996, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 1, and after oral argument the Court .took the matter under submission. The Court now renders this memorandum decision.
The issue in this case is, “what is an accident.” The beneficiary of an accidental death and dismemberment insurance policy and two life…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercuy Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Heighley v. J.C. Penney Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Khatchatrian v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Paulissen v. US LIFE INS. CO. IN CITY OF NYDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Ashot Khatchatrian v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Lana Guebara, Cross-Appellee v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.