Spaulding v. Polley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Kingfisher Countyj A. II. Huston, Judge. Action by Jay A. Polley against Mrs. F. E. Spaulding and D. H. Mills. Judgment for plaintiff and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
This action was to quiet title and remove cloud therefrom. The plaintiffs in error as defendants were brought in the court on service by publication. The affidavit therefor is made by one of the attorneys for. said plaintiff, without setting forth therein the reason why it is not made by the party himself, or that the facts were within the personal knowledge of such attorney, or that such party was not a resident of or absent from the county. The affidavit recites:
“This is an action brought by the plaintiff to determine his right and interest in and to the following described real estate, to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Harkness v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Ballew v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Eddy v. LafayetteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
- Wails v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Harrison v. BeardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Richardson v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Zahn v. ObertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Faulkner v. KirkesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- State Ex Rel. Collins v. ParksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Commonwealth Cotton Oil Co. v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.